DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 10th February 2025
Archives (PRELIMS & MAINS Focus) SHIV SHAKTI POINT Syllabus: Prelims & Mains – CURRENT EVENT Context: A study by scientists from the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) has estimated that the region where Chandrayaan-3 landed on the Moon is approximately 3.7 billion years old—coinciding with the period when primitive microbial life first emerged on Earth. Background: – India’s Chandrayaan-3 mission achieved a historic milestone on August 23, 2023, as it landed on the Moon’s south polar region, making India the fourth country to achieve a soft landing on the lunar surface and the first to reach the Moon’s South Pole. Key takeaways A team of scientists from Isro’s Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), Ahmedabad, has performed morphological and topographic analysis within the Chandrayaan-3 landing site, now known as the Shiv Shakti point. With the help of data generated by the Pragyan rover housed inside the Vikram lander onboard Chandrayaan-3, Indian scientists have been uncovering new interpretations and insights into the moon’s evolution. The latest study described the regional geography around the Shiv Shakti point. The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is enclosed between multiple large-impact craters: Manzinus (diameter about 96 km, age about 3.9 billion years) to the north, Boguslawsky (diameter about 95 km, age about 4 billion years) to the southeast, and Schomberger (diameter about 86 km, age about 3.7 billion years) to the south. Over the years, images have helped lunar scientists globally to rebuild the history of Manzinus and Boguslawsky, with both craters appearing to have flat crater floors and subdued crater wall structures. Each of these craters is categorised as shallow, with Boguslawsky being hollower than Manzinus and Schomberger. What distinguishes the Schomberger crater is its depth and well-preserved structures — including the central peak, wall terrains, raised crater rim, and steep crater walls — along with an ejecta blanket. Source: Indian Express PLAN TO AMEND NUCLEAR LIABILITY LAW Syllabus: Prelims & Mains – CURRENT EVENT Context: Union government’s announcement that it would amend the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act (CLNDA), 2010, and the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, is likely to enthuse American and French nuclear power companies, whose projects have been deadlocked due to legal concerns for more than 15 years. Background: – The announcement, which marked a sharp U-turn from the government’s position in 2015, was made in the Budget speech on February 1. In particular, it is meant to help progress the Electricite de France (EDF) MoU to build six EPR1650 reactors at Jaitapur in Maharashtra that was signed in 2009 (with Areva), and American Westinghouse Electric Company’s (WEC) MoU, signed in 2012, to build six AP1000 reactors at Kovvada in Andhra Pradesh. Key takeaways Currently, India has a nuclear power capacity of 6,780 MW from 22 reactors, and the only foreign operator in India is Russia’s Rosatom. The CLNDA has been the biggest impediment to private sector participation due to a provision that pins liabilities on nuclear suppliers in addition to the operator in case of nuclear damage. Western nuclear power companies says that clauses in the CLNDA are unacceptable as they mandate a high degree of liability for suppliers and contradict the international Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC) which focuses only on the liability of operators of the plant. The clauses were inserted in 2012, where the then-in-Opposition NDA members had accused the government of letting Western companies off from liability, citing the Union Carbide-Bhopal gas leak case that killed thousands in 1984 and the Fukushima nuclear leak in Japan in 2011. Officials aware of discussions on the issue said that while the CLNDA would be amended to separate operator’s liability from supplier’s liability to bring it in line with the CSC, the Atomic Energy Act would liberalise investment in power projects in India. Source: The Hindu ARTICLE 371 Syllabus: Prelims & Mains – POLITY Context: A regional party in poll-bound Meghalaya has indicated that bringing the State under the purview of Article 371 could help resume rat-hole coal mining, which has been banned since April 2014. Background: Voice of the People Party (VPP) cited the example of Nagaland to seek Article 371 for Meghalaya. Key takeaways Special provisions provided to some States are listed in Articles 371 (A-J) in Part XXI of the Constitution, which deals with “temporary, transitional and special powers for certain States.” While Articles 370 (now abrogated) and 371 have been a part of the Constitution since 1950, Articles 371 (A-J) were incorporated in subsequent years through amendments. Article 371 of the Indian Constitution grants special provisions to Maharashtra and Gujarat. Article 371A was made in 1962 after a deal was struck between the Centre and the Naga People’s Convention creating the State of Nagaland. Under the provision, no Act of Parliament about the religious or social practices of the Nagas, their customary law and procedure, including civil and criminal justice matters, and ownership or transfer of land and resources will apply to Nagaland, unless the State’s Legislative Assembly passes a resolution to do so. Further, non-residents can’t buy land in Nagaland. Article 371B deals with Assam. Article 371C applies to Manipur and was inserted into the Constitution in 1972. Articles 371D and E include special provisions for Andhra Pradesh. Article 371F takes into account the unique status of Sikkim after its merger with India in 1975 and grants protection to existing laws. Only descendants of Sikkim subjects (those who lived in the State before its merger with India) whose names were mentioned in the 1961 register have the right to own land and get State government jobs in Sikkim. Article 371G applies to Mizoram. It includes special provisions to preserve the religious and social practices, customary law, and procedure of Mizos in Mizoram, as well as for the administration of criminal and civil justice, besides ownership and transfer of land. Article 371H confers a special responsibility on the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh concerning law and order. Article 371I relates to Goa. It requires the Legislative Assembly of Goa to consist of not less than 30 members. Article 371J accords special status to the Hyderabad-Karnataka Region (Kalyana Karnataka). Source: The
DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 10th February 2025 Read More »
