DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 10th September – 2025
rchives (PRELIMS Focus) Harappan script Category: HISTORY Context: The Harappan script remains undeciphered despite decades of study. To address this, the Ministry of Culture is hosting an international conference in New Delhi from September 11–13, 2025, led by the Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts (IGNCA). Scholars remain divided on the language roots—some suggest Sanskrit, others Dravidian, and still others Adivasi languages like Santali and Gondi. A key challenge is the lack of bilingual texts, making comparison impossible. Many researchers believe the script encoded rules of taxation and commerce rather than direct phonetic spelling. While some claim up to 90% of symbols have been deciphered, no consensus exists. Recent studies highlight the commercial and ritual use of seals, particularly at sites like Lothal. The conference aims to pool multidisciplinary insights, but the Harappan script officially remains undeciphered. Learning Corner: Harappan Language NCERT Perspective NCERT highlights that the Harappans used a script of pictographs engraved mainly on seals and pottery. Between 250–400 signs have been identified. These are not alphabetical but pictorial, possibly representing sounds, objects, or ideas. Most inscriptions are very short, averaging only a few signs. This brevity prevents clear understanding of the language. The script remains undeciphered, and we do not yet know what language the Harappans spoke. Scholarly Insights The Harappan language is unknown because the script has not been cracked and no bilingual text (like the Rosetta Stone for Egyptian) has been found. Hypotheses on its linguistic roots include: Proto-Dravidian (supported by many linguists and archaeologists). A language isolate, unrelated to known families, inferred from certain substratum influences in later Sanskrit. Some fringe theories suggest links to early Indo-Aryan or tribal languages, but none are proven. The inscriptions are usually written right to left, sometimes alternating direction (boustrophedon). Statistical studies suggest the signs follow structured patterns, implying it was likely a formal communication system. Challenges in Decipherment Short inscriptions make it difficult to analyze grammar or syntax. Unknown underlying language prevents phonetic assignments. No bilingual evidence exists to provide a breakthrough. Probable Function The script may not have been used for long narrative writing. Evidence suggests it was mainly for economic, administrative, and ritual purposes—for example, marking trade goods, recording rations, or identifying ownership. Harappan Civilization Chronology and Extent Flourished between 2600 BCE – 1900 BCE (Mature Harappan phase). Spread across present-day India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan; largest among Bronze Age civilizations, covering over 1.5 million sq. km. Major sites: Harappa, Mohenjodaro, Dholavira, Lothal, Kalibangan, Rakhigarhi. Urban Planning Known for well-planned cities with grid patterns, straight streets, and advanced drainage systems. Use of standardized burnt bricks in construction. Division into Citadel (public buildings, granaries, baths) and Lower Town (residential areas). Great Bath at Mohenjodaro is a striking example of public architecture. Economy Agriculture: Wheat, barley, peas, sesame, and cotton (world’s earliest evidence). Irrigation was limited but floodplains were fertile. Trade: Internal and external—links with Mesopotamia, Oman, and Persia; export of beads, cotton textiles, and precious stones. Crafts: Bead-making, pottery, metallurgy (copper, bronze, gold, silver). Polity and Society No clear evidence of kingship or centralized monarchy; authority may have been with merchants, priests, or elite councils. Society appears relatively egalitarian—uniform town planning and weights suggest standardized control. Seals with animal motifs indicate religious, administrative, or trade significance. Religion and Beliefs Evidence of Mother Goddess worship and male deities resembling proto-Shiva (Pashupati seal). Sacred animals like the bull and unicorn symbol. Fire altars at Kalibangan; no temples found. Belief in afterlife suggested by burial practices. Script and Language Indus script: Pictographic with ~250–400 signs; still undeciphered. Inscriptions are short, mainly on seals and pottery. Language remains unknown. Decline By 1900 BCE, decline began due to a combination of factors: Climatic changes (drying of Saraswati river, floods). Overuse of resources and decline in trade. Possible invasions or internal social changes. By 1300 BCE, most cities were abandoned. Source: THE INDIAN EXPRESS Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) Category: INTERNATIONAL Context : Ethiopia has inaugurated the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) on the Blue Nile Ethiopia has inaugurated the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) on the Blue Nile, Africa’s largest hydroelectric project. Standing 170 meters tall and nearly 2 km wide, the dam can hold 74 billion cubic meters of water and generate 5,150 MW of power, boosting Ethiopia’s energy capacity and reducing blackouts. Egypt, which depends on the Nile for almost all its water, has strongly opposed the project, calling it an “existential threat” and protesting at the UN Security Council. It fears reduced water supply could harm its national security. Ethiopia maintains the dam will not harm downstream nations, as it is for electricity, not irrigation. The project is expected to benefit the region by enabling electricity exports and industrial growth. Despite mediation efforts by global powers and the African Union, the dispute remains unresolved, with GERD symbolizing both Ethiopia’s progress and a source of regional tension. Learning Corner: Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) GERD is Africa’s largest hydroelectric project, built by Ethiopia on the Blue Nile River, near the Sudanese border. Construction began in 2011, and the dam is a symbol of Ethiopia’s modernization and national pride. Key Features Height: 170 meters; Length: nearly 2 km. Reservoir Capacity: 74 billion cubic meters of water. Power Generation: 5,150 MW, making it the largest dam in Africa by electricity output. Purpose: Hydroelectric power generation (not irrigation). Significance for Ethiopia Nearly 45% of Ethiopians lack electricity; GERD aims to expand access, reduce blackouts, and promote industrialization. Expected to generate surplus electricity for export to neighboring countries like Sudan, Kenya, and Tanzania. Seen as a unifying national project amid Ethiopia’s internal political challenges. Regional Tensions Egypt’s Concerns: Relies on the Nile for 97% of its water; fears GERD will reduce water flow, posing an “existential threat.” Sudan’s Position: Mixed—concerns over water management but potential to benefit from regulated flow and cheap power. Diplomatic negotiations led by the US, World Bank, African Union, and others have failed to produce a binding agreement. Source: THE HINDU AdFalciVax Category: INTERNATIONAL Context: The Union government has
DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 10th September – 2025 Read More »
