DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 25th November 2024
Archives (PRELIMS & MAINS Focus) THE TRUMP EFFECT ON INDIA Syllabus: Mains – GS 2 Context: Mr. Donald Trump has not yet assumed the office of President of the United States. With seven weeks remaining until the inauguration, discussions worldwide are centered on the potential impact of his presidency. Background: – Mr Trump’s ‘Make America Great Again’ is not likely to make the planet a better or safer or more prosperous place. It is, according to Mr Trump, in America’s self-interest. Core Trump ideas Trump, the Mercantilist and the impact Belief in High Tariffs: Advocates high tariffs to protect U.S. interests, particularly targeting imports from China. Impact on U.S. Economy: High tariffs likely to increase costs for industries and consumers, leading to inflation. Inflation could prompt the Federal Reserve to raise policy rates, reversing earlier cuts. Higher interest rates will reverse the flow of capital and developing countries like India will witness outflow of funds. Against a stronger dollar, the Indian rupee will lose value. China may redirect exports to other countries, increasing dumping. India already imposes significant anti-dumping duties on Chinese goods. High U.S. tariffs may trigger retaliatory measures, disrupting world trade. Trump, the Protectionist Industrial Policies: Plans to incentivize domestic manufacturing may hamper foreign direct investments in countries like India. Immigration and Deportation: Promised to deport up to one million illegal immigrants in the first hundred days. Indian deportations could impact bilateral ties. Possible tightening of H1B1 visa regulations, conflicting with U.S. industry needs for skilled Indian professionals. Trump, the Climate Sceptic Energy Policy: Nominated Chris Wright, a proponent of fracking and drilling, as Energy Secretary. Denial of climate crisis likely to hinder COP efforts on Climate Change. Aligns with India’s position for slower COP implementation. Pharmaceutical Industry: Anticipation of deregulation and higher drug prices, which may affect global healthcare affordability. Source: Indian Express LACHIT BORPHUKAN Syllabus: Prelims – HISTORY Context: Every year, 24th November is celebrated as the ‘Lachit Diwas’ to mark the birth anniversary of the Assamese folk hero Lachit Borphukan. Background: – He is considered one of the greatest of Assamese heroes, symbolising the valour, courage, and intelligence that defines the Assamese self-identity. Key takeaways Lachit Borphukan was a legendary army commander of the Ahom kingdom. He defeated the Mughal forces, led by Raja Ramsingh-I, in the ‘Battle of Saraighat’, and thwarted a drawn-out attempt by them to take back Assam. Lachit was born on November 24, 1622, and grew up during a turbulent period of Assam’s history. He was chosen as one of the five Borphukans of the Ahom kingdom by king Charadhwaj Singha, and given administrative, judicial, and military responsibilities. Battles of Alaboi and Saraighat Between 1615 and 1682, the Mughal Empire made a series of attempts, under Jahangir and then Aurangzeb, to annex the Ahom kingdom. In 1662, Mughal Governor of Bengal Mir Jumla’s forces engaged with the Ahom army and went on to occupy part of the territory under Ahom rule. Between 1667 and 1682, the Ahoms under a series of rulers, launched a counter-offensive to reclaim lost territories. In 1669, Aurangzeb dispatched the Rajput Raja Ram Singh I to recapture territories won back by the Ahoms. The battle of Alaboi was fought on August 5, 1669 in the Alaboi Hills near Dadara in North Guwahati. While the Mughals preferred an open battle, Borphukan relied on his knowledge of the territory and engaged in guerrilla warfare, which provided an edge to his smaller, but fast moving and capable forces. After initial setbacks, Ram Singh sent his entire battery of Rajput soldiers and Mughal veterans and turned the tide of the battle. Unlike in Alaboi, where he was forced to fight on land instead of a naval battle, Lachit in Saraighat enticed the Mughals into a naval battle. Ahom forces combined a frontal attack and a surprise attack from behind. They lured the Mughal fleet into moving ahead by feigning an attack with a few ships from the front. The Mughals vacated the waters behind them, from where the main Ahom fleet attacked and achieved a decisive victory. Lachit died a year after the Battle of Saraighat from a long festering illness. In fact he was very ill during the Battle of Saraighat, as he heroically led his troops to victory. This only added to his legend. The battle of Saraighat proved that Lachit Barphukan was a master strategist who can be compared with the great generals in any part of India. Aptly, the Lachit Barphukan gold medal, instituted in 1999, is given to the best cadet from the National Defence Academy. Source: Indian Express ARGENTINA CONSIDERS PARIS TREATY PULLOUT Syllabus: Prelims & Mains – CURRENT EVENT Context: Argentina’s far-right President Javier Milei is considering withdrawing his country from the Paris Climate Agreement. Background: The speculation surfaced after Milei’s government asked its negotiators to leave the ongoing COP29 climate summit last week. Key takeaways The Paris Agreement is an international accord that was adopted by nearly every country in 2015 to address climate change and its adverse effects. Its primary goal is to substantially reduce GHG emissions in a bid to limit global warming in this century to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, while pursuing the means to curb warming to 1.5 degrees. The treaty requires all Parties (countries which have joined the agreement) to state every five years what they are doing to tackle climate change — what is known as their nationally determined contribution (NDC). Each successive NDC is meant to reflect an increasingly higher degree of ambition compared to the previous version, according to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). How does a country withdraw from the Paris Agreement? Article 28 of the Paris Agreement lays out the procedure and timeline for a country’s withdrawal from the treaty. It says, “at any time after three years from the date on which this Agreement has entered into force (this happened in 2016) for a Party, that Party may withdraw from this Agreement by giving written
DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS IAS | UPSC Prelims and Mains Exam – 25th November 2024 Read More »
